
| Element | Reporting arrangements |
|---|---|
| Solicitor-General | A |
| Administrative Appeals Tribunal | B |
| Administrative Review Council | B |
| Australasian Centre for Policing Research | C |
| Australian Crime Commission | B |
| Australian Customs Service | B |
| Australian Federal Police | B |
| Australian Government Solicitor | B |
| Australian Institute of Criminology | B |
| Australian Institute of Police Management | C |
| Australian Law Reform Commission | B |
| Australian Security Intelligence Organisation | B |
| Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre | B |
| Copyright Tribunal | D |
| Criminology Research Council | B |
| CrimTrac | B |
| Defence Force Discipline Appeal Tribunal | D |
| Family Court of Australia | B |
| Family Law Council | B |
| Federal Court of Australia | B |
| Federal Magistrates Court of Australia | B |
| Federal Police Disciplinary Tribunal | B&D |
| High Court of Australia | B |
| Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission | B |
| Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia | B&E |
| National Crime Statistics Unit | C |
| National Institute of Forensic Science | C |
| National Native Title Tribunal | B |
| Office of Film and Literature Classification | B |
| Office of Parliamentary Counsel | B |
| Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions | B |
| Office of the Privacy Commissioner | B |
This functional statement is published to meet the requirements of section 8 of the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (the FOI Act).
The Department's statement is provided first, followed by those of the Copyright Tribunal, Solicitor-General and Defence Force Discipline Appeal Tribunal (none of which publish their own annual reports). Agencies publishing their own annual reports are listed at Appendix 1. FOI statistics for the Department and all portfolio agencies are set out in the Attorney-General's annual report to the Parliament on the operation of the FOI Act, which is accessible at www.ag.gov.au/foi.
The Department was one of the original departments established at Federation in 1901.
The organisation chart published in Departmental Overview shows the structure of the Department.
The broad functions of the Department are described in the departmental overview of this report - see Departmental Overview. Legislation administered by the Attorney-General is published in the Administrative Arrangements Order, which is available at www.pmc.gov.au/docs/aao.cfm.
A variety of bodies, through their association with the Department, facilitate participation, by persons or bodies outside the Commonwealth administration, in the policy-making functions of the Department or in its administration of various schemes and enactments. Examples of such bodies are:
Accessible Public Transport National Advisory Committee
Administrative Review Council
Anti-Money Laundering Coordination Committee
Attorney-General's Non-Government Organisation on Domestic Human Rights (25 peak human rights bodies)
AUSTRAC Proof of Identity Steering Committee
Australasian Centre for Policing Research
Australasian Police Ministers' Council (APMC)
Australia – New Zealand Ministerial Forum on Crime Prevention
Australian Federation of Disability Organisations
Banking and Finance Infrastructure Assurance Advisory Group
Biannual Ministerial Meeting with Financial Institutions
Board of the Australian Crime Commission
Building Access Policy Committee
Built Environment Expert Advisory Group
Business–Government Advisory Group on National Security
Catholic Welfare Australia
Copyright Law Review Committee
Corrective Services Ministers Conference
Critical Infrastructure Advisory Council
CIP Futures Expert Advisory Group
Family Services Australia
Firearms Policy Working Group
Heads of Commonwealth Law Enforcement Agencies
Icons and Public Gatherings Infrastructure Assurance Advisory Group
International Legal Services Advisory Council
Interdepartmental Committee on the OECD Working Group on Bribery's Phase 2 Review of Australia and the Asia Development Bank/OECD Anti-Corruption Action Plan
Intergovernmental Committee on the Australian Crime Commission
Law Council of Australia
Ministerial Advisory Committee on AIDS, Sexual Health and Hepatitis
Ministerial Advisory Group on Money Laundering
Model Criminal Code Officers Committee
National Aboriginal Justice Advisory Committee
National Alternative Dispute Resolution Advisory Council
National Inhalant Abuse Taskforce
National Motor Vehicle Theft Reduction Council
National Shooters Advisory Council
Native Title Consultative Forum
National Working Group on the Diversion of Precursor Chemicals
Relationships Australia
Standing Committee of Attorneys-General (SCAG)
Systems Working Group on Implementation of Anti-Money Laundering Reforms
Water Services Infrastructure Assurance Advisory Group
The following categories of documents are held by the Department:
Many documents held by the Department are available free of charge upon request. Others are publicly available for purchase.
The FOI Act also, subject to certain exceptions, provides persons with a legally enforceable right of access to documents held
by the Department.
Enquiries and requests to obtain access to any document held by the Department should be directed to:
Director
Coordination and Support Services Section
Attorney-General's Department
Robert Garran Offices
National Circuit
BARTON ACT 2600
Phone: (02) 6250 5693
Fax: (02) 6250 5948
The Copyright Tribunal was established by the Copyright Act 1968.
Section 138 of the Copyright Act provides for a Copyright Tribunal consisting of a President and such number of Deputy Presidents and other members as are appointed.
The jurisdiction of the Tribunal can be summarised as follows:
The Tribunal maintains the following categories of documents:
Enquiries and requests to obtain access to documents held by the Tribunal should be forwarded to:
The Secretary
Copyright Tribunal
Level 16
Law Courts Building
Queens Square
SYDNEY NSW 2000
Phone: (02) 9230 8567
Fax: (02) 9230 8535
The office of Solicitor-General was established under the Law Officers Act 1964.
The Solicitor-General is the Second Law Officer of the Commonwealth (the Attorney-General is the First Law Officer).
The Law Officers Act sets out the functions of the office, which include acting as counsel for the Commonwealth, giving opinions on questions of law to the Attorney-General, and carrying out such other functions, ordinarily performed by counsel, as the Attorney-General requests.
The Solicitor-General maintains the following categories of documents:
Enquiries and requests to obtain access to documents should be directed to:
Director
Coordination and Support Services Section
Attorney-General's Department
Robert Garran Offices
National Circuit
BARTON ACT 2600
Phone: (02) 6250 5693
Fax: (02) 6250 5948
The Defence Force Discipline Appeal Tribunal was established under the Defence Force Discipline Appeals Act 1955.
The Tribunal consists of a President, Deputy President and members. It has a Registrar and Deputy Registrars as required. The principal office of the Tribunal is located in Canberra.
The Tribunal is empowered to hear and determine appeals by persons who have been convicted of a Service off ence by a court martial or a Defence Force Magistrate under the Defence Force Discipline Act 1982 or acquitted on the ground of unsoundness of mind. Subject to the reference of questions of law to the Federal Court of Australia, the Tribunal's determination is final.
The Tribunal maintains the following categories of documents:
Enquiries and requests to obtain access to documents held by the Tribunal should be forwarded to:
Federal Court of Australia
ACT Registry
1st Floor
Commonwealth Law Courts Building
Childers Street
CANBERRA ACT 2601
Phone: (02) 6267 0566
Fax: (02) 6267 0625
The Attorney-General's Department Service Charter and associated complaints-handling policy have been in operation since June 1998. The departmental charter is supplemented by the International Child Abduction, Child Support and Civil Procedure (ICACSCP) Service Charter and the Trade Measures Review Secretariat (TMRS) Service Charter.
Apart from the departmental areas covered by their own specific service charter, the Attorney-General's Department has limited direct dealings with members of the public. The Department serves the Australian Government, and through it, the people of Australia.
The departmental and ICACSCP charters can be viewed on the Department's home page at www.ag.gov.au. The TMRS charter can be viewed at www.law.gov.au/tmro. All charters of the Department are available to clients as
hard copy.
The following table sets out the customer service standards contained in each charter and the extent to which they were met during 2004–05.
| Charter | Service standard | Compliance with service standard |
|---|---|---|
| Attorney-General's Department | A reply in plain English within 28 days of receipt of complaint, including the name and telephone number of the person dealing with the complaint. | All complaints, except one,* received a response within 28 days in compliance with standard. |
| Personal information used only in accordance with the law. | No misuse of personal information, resulting in a breach of the privacy legislation, has been reported by the Privacy Commissioner. | |
| Work will be undertaken with care, diligence and sensitivity to the needs of clients. | ** | |
| Strong commitment to accountability and continuous improvement. | ** | |
| Clients will be treated with courtesy, fairness and respect. | One complaint in relation to Output 1.4 alleged a failure to treat clients with courtesy, fairness and respect. This complaint was reported last year and finalised during this reporting period. The conclusion was that there had been no breach of the service standard. | |
| Staff will act responsively to client needs. | ** | |
| International Child Abduction, Child Support and Civil Procedure | Reply within 28 days of receipt of complaint. | No complaints were received during the reporting period. |
| Personal information used only in accordance with the law. | No misuse of personal information, resulting in a breach of the privacy legislation, has been reported by the Privacy Commissioner for attention. | |
| Correspondence to be a well-considered reply in plain English and to include the name and telephone number of the person dealing with the complaint. | ** | |
| Subject to case-load priorities, we will act promptly for clients. | ** | |
| Clients will be treated with courtesy, fairness and respect. | ** | |
| Clients will be referred to the appropriate body if we cannot help. | ** | |
| Trade Measures Review Secretariat | Provision of professional and independent support to the Review Officer, ensuring that reviews are conducted in a timely, accurate and fair manner. | No complaints were received during the reporting period. |
| Provision of as much access as possible to the review process, ensuring that all interested parties are given the opportunity to have their views considered. | Public notices were published in the Australian Financial Review newspaper. | |
| Personal information used only in accordance with the law. | No misuse of personal information, resulting in a breach of the privacy legislation, has been reported by the Privacy Commissioner. | |
| Provision of accurate, concise and well-considered responses in plain English to written correspondence. | ** | |
| Generally, a written reply within 28 days of receiving letters will be provided. Alternatively, an interim response outlining the delay and when you can expect a response will be provided. | A written reply within 28 days of receipt of letter was provided in all cases. | |
| Correspondence will include the name and telephone number of the person dealing with letters. | ** |
* A longer time frame than that specified in the service standard was taken to deal with the complaint. Mechanisms have been put in place to remedy this situation.
** Information relating to these performance standards (including complaints data, compliments, and feedback from focus groups of staff or clients and surveys) indicates that they are being maintained.
Clients of the Department and those of ICACSCP and TMRS can make a complaint or provide feedback in writing, via email, by telephone or in person. Staff of the Department, wherever possible, are encouraged to resolve complaints immediately. In those instances where a resolution cannot be reached at the time of the complaint, the complaint systems for all three charters require the recording of the following information for investigation and appropriate action:
Departmental policy requires that the approving officer must ensure that the selection processes for consultants will promote open and eff ective competition to the extent practicable. Departmental selection procedures detail criteria that are to be addressed and refer to the core policies and principles for purchasing activities, including engaging consultants, outlined in the Commonwealth procurement guidelines. All consultants were engaged by the Department in accordance with appropriate principles and practices.
Consultancy services are one particular type of service delivered under a contract for services. They are distinguished from other contracts for services by the nature of the work performed. A consultant is an entity, whether an individual, a partnership or a corporation, engaged to provide professional independent and expert advice or services. Typically, the term consultancy services is used to describe the application of expert professional skills to express an original concept; investigate or diagnose a defined issue or problem; carry out defi ned research, reviews or evaluations; or provide independent advice, information or creative solutions to assist the agency in management decision making.
The Department's consultancies have been identifi ed using the Department of Finance and Administration's document titled Guidance on identifying consultancies for annual report purposes.
Details of contractors—for example those engaged through employment agencies for short-term relief or other purposes—are not included in this report.
In accordance with the Requirements for annual reports for departments, executive agencies and FMA Act bodies, detailed information relating to new consultancy contracts to the value of $10,000 or more (inclusive of GST) is provided in Table 9.
During 2004–05, 33 new consultancy contracts were entered into involving actual expenditure of $2,012,698. In addition, 14 ongoing consultancy contracts were active during the year involving total actual expenditure of $1,012,255.
| Consultant name | Description | Contract price ($) | Selection process | Justification |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMBIT Recruitment | Development of Enterprise Architecture (IT) for Department | 25,000 | Direct sourcing | A |
| Australian Institute of Criminology | Research into the impact and cases of the cessation or adjournment of Australian criminal trials | 100,000 | Direct sourcing | B, C |
| Australian Institute of Criminology | Research into the nature of firearms theft | 55,000 | Direct sourcing | B, C |
| Australian Institute of Criminology | Review of Australia's firearm legislation | 55,000 | Direct sourcing | B, C |
| Australian Institute of Criminology | Research into firearms penalties and sentencing for firearms offences | 130,000 | Direct sourcing | B |
| Blunn, Anthony | Review of the Regulation of Access to Communications | 80,000 | Direct sourcing | C |
| CNM & Associates | Review of Prevention,Diversion and Rehabilitation Program | 19,305# | Direct sourcing | C |
| Creswell, Chris | Conduct major projects in the Copyright Law Branch requiring high-level expertise | 110,042 | Direct sourcing | B |
| HBO+EMTB Consulting | Advice on leasing and Heads of Agreement issues | 34,831 | Select tender | B |
| Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission | Development, printing and distribution of culturally specific education materials on pregnancy and potential pregnancy discrimination in the workplace for Indigenous women | 40,000 | Direct sourcing | A |
| Insight SRC | Conduct work and wellbeing survey and provide analysis of results | 20,000 | Direct sourcing | B |
| Interaction Consulting Group | Design, develop and deliver programs on Understanding Public Service Accountabilities | 110,880 | Direct sourcing | B |
| KAZ Technology Services Pty Ltd | Scoping study to investigate broad options and costs for the development of a national firearms management system | 786,912 | Open tender | B, C |
| Le Quesne & Associates (Aust) Pty Ltd | Independent advice on service requirements for new building for Department | 12,320 | Direct sourcing | C |
| Lloyd, Stephen | Finalise Administrative Review Council's final report on The scope of the judicial review | 12,000 | Direct sourcing | B |
| Sparke Helmore | Finalisation of request for tender for legal aid services for Indigenous Australians | 10,450# | Direct sourcing | C |
| Task Dynamics | Review of policy and procedures in relation to the Family Violence Prevention Legal Services program | 21,780 | Select tender | B |
| Techniworks Action Learning Pty Ltd | Provide e-learning solutions for training in HR compliance matters | 22,000 | Select tender | B |
| University of Western Australia | Research of high-need areas for Indigenous family violence | 28,905 | Direct sourcing | C |
| WalterTurnbull | Provision of financial analysis requirements for request for tender for legal aid services for Indigenous Australians | 50,007# | Direct sourcing | B |
| WT Partnership | Quantity surveying services for new building for Department | 112,000 | Open tender | B |
# Indicates actual expenditure as no fixed-contract price, or payment exceeded agreed contract price. Information regarding these contracts is as follows:
CNM & Associates: This was a fixed-price contract that was extended following the completion of the review to provide for additional associated work that the contractor was engaged to undertake.
Sparke Helmore: A fixed-price contract was not entered into due to the nature of the task and the likely variation in estimated time to complete the work.
Walter Turnbull: A flexible-costing arrangement was entered into on the basis that the number of respondents to the tender process would be unknown.
Open tender: A request for tender is published widely, and all submissions received before the deadline are accepted from
any potential suppliers who satisfy the conditions for participation.
Select tender: An invitation to tender is issued to potential suppliers from a short list.
Direct sourcing: A form of restricted tendering in which an agency may invite a potential supplier or suppliers of its choice
to make a submission because of their expertise and/or their special ability to supply the goods and/or services sought.
Panel: An invitation to tender is issued to a panel of potential suppliers (who have pre-qualified) established by the agency
to supply to government.
Justification for decision to use consultancy:
A: skills currently unavailable within agency
B: need for specialised or professional skills
C: need for independent research or assessment
Note:
In some instances, additional costs for expenses and travel have been met from ordinary departmental administrative
cost allocations. Resources are not available to conduct the detailed searches of individual financial transaction records
required to identify such costs.
Under section 311A of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 the Department is required to disclose payments of $1,500 or more (inclusive of GST) to specific types of organisations. These organisations are advertising agencies, market research organisations, polling organisations, direct mail organisations and media advertising organisations. There were no payments during 2004–05 to polling or direct mail organisations. Details of payments to the other categories of organisations are set out below.
| Name of organisation | Payment($) | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Advertising agency | ||
| Brown Melhuish Fishlock Pty Ltd | 189,979 | Development of national security campaign |
| Market research organisation | ||
| Worthington Di Marzio Pty Ltd | 148,275 | Market research on national security |
| Media advertising organisations | ||
| Eryl Morgan Publications Pty Ltd | 2,500 | Advertising promoting winners of EMA's Safer Community Awards |
| Eryl Morgan Publications Pty Ltd | 3,000 | Advertising campaign for Working together to manage emergencies programs |
| HMA Blaze Pty Ltd | 25,183 | Non-campaign government advertising (recruitment, job vacancies) |
| HMA Blaze Pty ltd | 55,521 | Advertising campaign for Working together to manage emergencies programs |
| HMA Blaze Pty Ltd | 7,594 | Campaign to promote the Regional Law Hotline in Tasmania |
| HMA Blaze Pty Ltd | 26,138 | Request for tenders for the provision of legal services for Indigenous Australians |
| HMA Blaze Pty Ltd | 59,074 | Advertising of the National Community Crime Prevention Programme grants |
| HMA Blaze Pty Ltd | 6,813 | Call for applications for service providers for the expansion of the Indigenous Family Violence Prevention Legal Services Program |
| Inmedia Publishing Pty Ltd | 2,932 | Advertising campaign for Working together to manage emergencies programs |
| Universal McCann Pty Ltd | 7,150,000 | National security campaign advertising |
The tables in Appendix 6 show staffing details for the Department at 30 June 2004 and 30 June 2005.
Table 11 provides a breakdown by location (region), broad-banded classifi cation and gender for the Department. It includes all staff employed by the Department under the Public Service Act 1999—that is ongoing, non-ongoing, full-time and part-time. Part-time staff are shown as full-time equivalents.
Table 12 shows staff numbers by head count—that is, part-time staff are shown as the number of people employed, not full-time equivalents. Therefore, there is no correlation between the total figures in the two tables. The total figures in Table 11 will be smaller than those shown in Table 12.
For the purposes of these tables, part-time staff are defined as staff members who work less than the standard hours per week (standard hours being 37 hours 30 minutes).
Only those staff that were paid by the Department are counted for the purposes of these tables. Staff on leave without pay and contractors are not counted.
Irregular or intermittent (casual) staff, numbering 38 at 30 June 2004, and 39 at 30 June 2005, are not recorded in these tables.
| At 30 June 2004 | At 30 June 2005 | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SES | Executive Level 1–2 & equivalent | APS Level 1–6 & equivalent | Total | SES | Executive Level 1–2 & equivalent | APS Level 1–6 & equivalent | Total | |||||||||
| M | F | M | F | M | F | M | F | M | F | M | F | M | F | M | F | |
| Australian Capital Territory | 34.0 | 23.4 | 153.3 | 139.3 | 116.2 | 283.7 | 303.5 | 446.4 | 38.0 | 24.8 | 160.8 | 153.9 | 136.3 | 302.0 | 335.1 | 480.6 |
| Victoria | 0 | 0 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 14.0 | 16.0 | 20.0 | 22.0 | – | – | 8.4 | 9.0 | 14.0 | 14.6 | 22.4 | 23.6 |
| New South Wales | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Queensland | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| South Australia | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Western Australia | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1.0 | – | 2.0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| Northern Territory | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1.0 | – | 3.0 | – | 4.0 |
| Total | 34.0 | 23.4 | 159.3 | 145.3 | 130.2 | 299.7 | 323.5 | 468.4 | 38.0 | 24.8 | 170.2 | 163.9 | 157.3 | 327.6 | 365.5 | 516.2 |
| At 30 June 2004 | At 30 June 2005 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Ongoing | Non-ongoing | Total | Ongoing | Non-ongoing | ||||||
| Full-time | Part-time | Full-time | Part-time | Full-time | Part-time | Full-time | Part-time | ||||
| SES | Female | 24 | 22 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 22 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Male | 34 | 34 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 37 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Executive Level 1–2 & equivalent | Female | 151 | 132 | 15 | 4 | 0 | 172 | 143 | 24 | 5 | 0 |
| Male | 160 | 148 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 171 | 163 | 3 | 5 | 0 | |
| APS Level 1–6 & equivalent | Female | 308 | 239 | 17 | 48 | 4 | 338 | 263 | 24 | 48 | 3 |
| Male | 131 | 103 | 2 | 26 | 0 | 158 | 130 | 1 | 27 | 0 | |
| Total | Female | 483 | 393 | 34 | 52 | 4 | 535 | 428 | 50 | 54 | 3 |
| Male | 325 | 285 | 8 | 32 | 0 | 367 | 330 | 4 | 33 | 0 | |
The Department recognises the importance of providing a work environment that encourages team and individual achievement. In addition to its program of formal awards, the Department strongly encourages managers to use informal mechanisms to recognise good performance. It is against this background of constant encouragement and support that the Department can successfully implement its more formal reward and recognition arrangements.
The Department has in place a number of awards to acknowledge and reward individual and team achievements. Through these awards, the Department recognises and celebrates outstanding efforts and contributions of employees and promotes our departmental values.
These are additional to external awards, including the Public Service Medal, for which the Department will from time to time nominate employees.
The departmental awards are:
The Department's less formal recognition awards are administered by individual divisions and offices. A number of these awards were presented during this reporting period.
Recipients of awards for 2004–05 and noteworthy achievements are listed below.
Stephen Bouwhuis
In recognition of his role in advising on legal and drafting issues in the negotiation of the Australia – United States Free Trade Agreement 2004.
Stephen Fox
In recognition of his key role in the negotiations on copyright issues for the Australia – United States Free Trade Agreement 2004.
Peter Meibusch
In recognition of his outstanding leadership in the implementation of family law superannuation reform.
Michael Jerks and Leith Watson
In recognition of achieving a successful outcome to a multi-agency New Policy Proposal for Critical Infrastructure Protection.
Ross Butler
In recognition of his high level of dedication and loyalty, over and above that which is required to achieve the business goals of Corporate Services Group and the Department.
Christine Hawke
In recognition of her exemplary services to the Department in the management and delivery of information and library services.
Rachel Bacon
In recognition of her outstanding achievements academically, in her job performance, and for maintaining a healthy work–life balance.
Jim Anderson, Protective Security Coordination Centre—for excellence in the successful conduct of multi-jurisdictional counter-terrorism exercise Mercury 04.
Jill Baillie, Office of Legislative Drafting and Publishing—for her outstanding contribution to the success of the Federal Register of Legislative Instruments.
Gary Barkley, Protective Security Coordination Centre—for excellence in the successful management of a project to acquire armoured limousines for the Australian Government.
Alan Collins, Emergency Management Australia—for consistently high-level executive support of Emergency Management Australia's commitment to 'safer sustainable communities'.
Marc Hess, Security and Critical Infrastructure Division—for responsiveness and professionalism in fostering constructive international cooperation in the area of national security.
Peter Jonath, Trade Measures Review Secretariat—for an outstanding effort, often under considerable time pressures, for work in support of the Trade Measures Review Officer and strong and productive contribution to the independent reviews undertaken by this Office in respect of anti-dumping and countervailing matters.
Bernadette Metschke, Office of Legislative Drafting and Publishing—for her outstanding contribution to providing the Australian community with very high-quality electronic access to Commonwealth legislation.
Sean Mowbray, Criminal Justice Division—for the development of the criminal law in a way which has anticipated the needs of the government and community.
Sam Ahlin, Kirsti Haipola, Barton Hoyle, Mark Jennings, Gabrielle Mackey, Geoff McDonald, Claire Parkhill, Fiona Phillip s, Australia – United States Free Trade Agreement Copyright Obligations Team—for professionalism and dedication to achieving the Government's high priority of implementing the Australia – United States Free Trade Agreement.
Julie Atwell, Mark Jennings, Michael Johnson, Philip Kimpton, Paul Schofield, World Trade Organisation (WTO) Team—for excellent advice and legal assistance in WTO litigation.
Maryann Brooke, Eva Logan, Katherine Reimers, Trish Thorpe, Legal Aid Program Renegotiation Team—for demonstrating exceptional teamwork in renegotiating legal aid agreements with the States and Territories, managing ongoing work of the legal aid program, and coordinating participation in the Senate Inquiry into Legal Aid.
Ross Butler, Matt Madin, Gemma Smyth, Workplace Relations Committee Secretariat—for the commitment, initiative and professionalism displayed in support provided to the Workplace Relations Committee in the development of the Attorney-General's Department Agreement 2004.
Mark Carpenter, Coral Cottrell, Simon Hine, Simon Hogan, Paul Lyndon, Ruben Morten, Viet Duc Nguyen, Puran Singh, Information and Knowledge Services ComLaw Project Team—for demonstrated conspicuously high levels of professionalism and commitment in the successful development and implementation of ComLaw.
Richard Fairbrother, Lani Gibbons, Jessica Mackey, Kathryn Ovington, Heather Prostimo, Robin Warner, Kate Westmoreland, Mutual Assistance and Extradition Treaties Negotiation Team—for successful team negotiations of bilateral mutual assistance and extradition treaties.
Jodie Hagel, Dandy Latif, Craig Maconachie, 2004 Financial Reporting Team—for their outstanding efforts under considerable pressure for the successful preparation of the Department's 30 June 2004 annual financial statements.
~ar2004+austdayawards/$FILE/Australia+Day+Awards.jpeg)
2005 Australia Day Achievement Awards recipients
Greg Potter, Information and Knowledge Services—awarded a commendation from the Director-General of Emergency Management Australia for enhancements to media monitoring and information management systems in the Emergency Management Australia National Emergency Coordination Centre.
Diana Rahman, Protective Security Coordination Centre—awarded the 2005 ACT International Women's Day Award for her contribution to and work with Canberra's multicultural, interfaith and social justice organisations. This was awarded by the ACT Government Office for Women.
This report is presented in accordance with the requirements of section 74 of the Occupational Health and Safety (Commonwealth Employment) Act 1991 (the Act).
The Department has a general Occupational Health and Safety (OH&S) Policy that was reviewed during 2004–05 and an OH&S Agreement, as required under section 16 of the Act. These documents, together with a range of topic-specific OH&S policies, are available to staff electronically through the Department's intranet and are promoted in HR Matters, the newsletter produced by the Human Resources Branch.
The Department seeks to provide a healthy and safe work environment for all staff, contractors and visitors. It promotes the integration of prevention activities into day-to-day business.
The Occupational Health and Safety Committee met on a quarterly basis during the year, and the minutes of its meetings were made available to staff. Three new health and safety representatives were appointed to the Committee in 2004–05.
| Section 68 occurrences (Notification and reporting of accidents and dangerous occurrences) |
There was one notification. |
| Investigations | No investigations were conducted. |
| Section 45 directions (Power to direct that workplace, etc not be disturbed) |
No directions were given to the Department under s 45 of the Act. |
| Section 29 notices (Provisional improvement notices) |
No notices were issued under s 29 of the Act. |
| Section 30 notices (Duties of employers in relation to health and safety representatives) |
No notices were issued under s 30 of the Act. |
| Section 46 notices (Power to issue prohibition notices) |
No notices were issued under s 46 of the Act. |
| Section 47 notices (Power to issue improvement notices) |
No notices were issued under s 47 of the Act. |
The Department continued to conduct regular workplace inspections throughout 2004–05. Reports were provided to division heads outlining recommendations and improvements. There was continual improvement across the Department, with divisions displaying an ongoing commitment to eliminating OH&S hazards. Staff awareness of OH&S has increased, resulting in improved prevention of, and early intervention for, workplace injuries and illnesses.
Major activities completed in 2004–05 included:
The Department's priorities for 2005–06 are to:
The Commonwealth Disability Strategy is designed to assist agencies to improve access for people with disabilities to their programs, services and facilities. Under this strategy, the Department reports on its role as an employer and policy adviser.
Performance measure: Number of employment policies, procedures and practices that meet the requirements of the Disability Discrimination Act 1992.
Current level of performance 2004–05: The Department has approximately 50 employment policies and programs. During 2004–05, in keeping with the principles of the Disability Discrimination Act 1992, the following policies and programs were developed or reviewed:
Goals for 2005–06: The Department aims to:
Actions for 2005–06: During the development and implementation of new initiatives for the Agreement 2004, and the implementation or monitoring of strategies in the Workplace Diversity Program 2004–06, specific attention will be given to the principles of the Disability Discrimination Act.
Performance measures:
Percentage of recruitment information requested and provided in:
Average time taken to provide accessible information in:
Current level of performance 2004–05: 100 per cent of requested information is made available both electronically, in HyperText Markup Language (HTML) and Microsoft Word format, via the intranet, Internet and email, and in hard copy, via the post. No other format was requested. The average time to provide accessible information in both electronic and non-electronic formats is two days.
Goals for 2005–06: 100 per cent of requests for electronic information to be fulfilled within 48 hours of request.
100 per cent of customers requesting information in accessible formats, other than electronic, will be advised of the expected delivery date of their preferred format within 48 hours of the request.
Where necessary, extensions to the closing date for applications will be made in keeping with the time taken to supply information in accessible formats.
The recruitment unit will investigate the processes required to establish TTY functionality (in addition to the existing email and Web access) to enable all hearing-impaired applicants to successfully request information in accessible formats.
Actions for 2005–06: The recruitment unit to:
Performance measure: Percentage of recruiters and managers provided with information on reasonable adjustment.
Current level of performance 2004–05: Advice on reasonable adjustment for managers is available on the Department's intranet. 100 per cent of both internal recruiters and managers were provided with information about reasonable adjustments when requested. The recruitment guidelines were reviewed and include reference to the principles and practice of reasonable adjustment.
Goals for 2005–06: 100 per cent of managers will receive advice about the principles and practice of reasonable adjustment when requested.
Actions for 2005–06: The Human Resources Branch will provide information on reasonable adjustment on an ongoing basis as required.
Performance measure: Percentage of training and development programs that consider the needs of staff with disabilities.
Current level of performance 2004–05: 100 per cent of training and development nomination forms ask staff to identify any disability-related needs at the time of registration. 100 per cent of training and development evaluation forms ask staff to assess the management of their disability-related needs following the training sessions. 100 per cent of staff with disabilities who attended training or development programs report having their particular access needs addressed.
Goals for 2005–06: The introduction of an online enrolment and training module in the Department's human resource information system (Aurion) will capture information that considers the needs of staff with disabilities, and produce automated reports.
Actions for 2005–06: To input relevant data into the human resource information system, and develop and refine reporting capabilities.
Performance measure: Percentage of training and development programs that include information on disability issues as they relate to the program.
Current level of performance 2004–05: The Department offered 50 training and development programs during the year. Five of these programs—Orientation, Graduate Program, Management Skills Program, and two Client Relationship courses—address disability and diversity issues, representing 10 per cent of programs.
Programs contained in the People Development Strategy were reviewed before being offered during the year. Where appropriate, these were updated to include information on disability issues as they relate to the various training programs.
An online training program was developed for all staff as part of the Workplace Diversity Program 2004–06 that will include content on the APS Values and Code of Conduct, discrimination and legal compliance, cultural awareness, bullying and diversity, and occupational health and safety.
Goals for 2005–06: To roll out the online training program for all employees; to explore the option of expanding the online training available; and to ensure staff regularly refresh their knowledge and understanding in relation to the programs, especially disability issues.
Actions for 2005–06: To ensure staff participate in the online training program with particular emphasis on disability and diversity issues, and that all staff continue to attend accountability training.
Performance measure: Established complaints/grievance mechanisms, including access to external mechanisms, in operation.
Current level of performance 2004–05: The Department has established processes for handling complaints, which includes internal and external mechanisms, eg harassment contact officers, Employee Assistance Program, and the Australian Public Service Commission.
An analysis of complaints during the reporting period revealed no complaints or grievances involved disability issues in the workplace.
Departmental advices and guidelines on complaints handling and review of actions were promulgated on the Department's intranet site, to which all staff have access. All staff received an invitation to attend information sessions to advise them of the engagement of a new Employee Assistance Program provider and of the services offered through this program. This information was also promulgated via email and on the intranet site.
Goals for 2005–06: To increase staff awareness of the harassment contact officers and their roles; to review and update the policies and procedures of the complaints/grievances process and to advise 100 per cent of staff of any changes.
Actions for 2005–06: To provide training for new harassment contact officers and refresher training for existing officers.
Performance measure: Percentage of new or revised policy/program proposals that document consideration of the impact of the proposal before taking any decision.
Current level of performance 2004–05: Relevant policies/programs are assessed for their impact on the lives of people with disabilities prior to decision. Areas of particular focus during the year include the development of the Disability Standards for Access to Premises and the Disability Standards for Education, and amendments to the Disability Standards for Accessible Public Transport. Also, preliminary consultation occurred for the review of provisions of the Copyright Act 1968 to enable appropriate access by people with disability to copyright material.
Performance measure: Percentage of consultations about new or revised policy/program proposals that are developed in consultation with people with disabilities.
Current level of performance 2004–05: The Department provides funding to support the Disability Discrimination Act Standards Project, which facilitates the involvement of, and consultation with, the disability sector on the development of disability standards. Grants were provided to the Australian Federation of Disability Organisations (AFDO) to manage participation of disability sector representatives on the Building Access Policy Committee, which advises government on the development of the Disability Standards for Access to Premises.
In August 2004, People with Disability, in conjunction with AFDO and the National Association of Community Legal Centres, provided a report on national consultations on draft text of a United Nations Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities. The consultations were funded by a grant from the Department.
Departmental representatives met with disability sector representatives at the Attorney-General's NGO Forum on Domestic Human Rights in June 2005.
People with disability have been consulted about the possible need for amendments to the Copyright Act to enable appropriate access to copyright materials, and to examine ways to facilitate production of accessible-format material.
Performance measure: Percentage of new, revised or proposed policy/program announcements available in a range of accessible formats, and time taken in providing announcements in accessible formats.
Current level of performance 2004–05: The Department endeavours to publish all new, revised and proposed policy/program announcements electronically in a minimum of two formats suitable for screen-readers. The preferred formats for publishing are HTML and Microsoft Word.
| Requests carried forward from 2003–04 | 14 |
| New requests made | 9 |
| Requests granted | 7 |
| Requests withdrawn | 2 |
| Requests refused | 0 |
| Requests otherwise discontinued | 0 |
| Requests continuing | 14 |
| Hong Kong – Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China | 1 |
| Netherlands | 1 |
| Solomon Islands | 1 |
| Thailand | 2 |
| United Kingdom | 1 |
| United States of America | 1 |
| Australia | 2 |
| Fiji | 1 |
| Hong Kong – Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China | 1 |
| Netherlands | 1 |
| Pakistan | 1 |
| United Kingdom | 1 |
| Child sex | 2 |
| Drugs | 1 |
| Manslaughter | 1 |
| Murder | 1 |
| People smuggling | 1 |
| Perverting course of justice | 1 |
In previous reporting years, Australia has requested the prosecution of people in foreign countries that had refused Australian extradition requests for those people on the grounds of nationality. At 30 June 2005, one such case was continuing.
| Canada | 2 |
| Hong Kong – Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China | 2 |
| Ireland | 1 |
| Malaysia | 1 |
| South Africa | 1 |
| United Kingdom | 5 |
| United States of America | 2 |
| Requests carried forward from 2003–04 | 44 |
| New requests received | 15 |
| Requests granted | 12 |
| Requests withdrawn | 3 |
| Requests refused by the Attorney-General | 1 |
| Requests refused by the Courts | 0 |
| Requests otherwise discontinued | 10 |
| Requests continuing | 33 |
| Belgium | 2 |
| Brazil | 1 |
| Germany | 2 |
| Hong Kong – Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China | 2 |
| Pitcairn Island | 1 |
| Sri Lanka | 1 |
| Switzerland | 1 |
| United Kingdom | 1 |
| United States of America | 1 |
| Australia 3 | 3 |
| Belgium 1 | 1 |
| Brazil 1 | 1 |
| Germany 2 | 2 |
| Sri Lanka 1 | 1 |
| Switzerland 1 | 1 |
| United Kingdom 2 | 2 |
| United States of America 1 | 1 |
* Nine of the people surrendered consented to being returned to the requesting country.
| Assault | 1 |
| Child sex | 2 |
| Drugs | 1 |
| Fraud | 3 |
| Money laundering | 1 |
| Sexual assault | 1 |
| Taxation offences/fraud | 1 |
| Theft | 2 |
| Argentina | 2 |
| Cambodia | 1 |
| Canada | 1 |
| Germany | 1 |
| Greece | 1 |
| Hong Kong – Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China | 1 |
| Hungary | 1 |
| India | 1 |
| Ireland | 1 |
| Italy | 1 |
| Lebanon | 2 |
| Philippines | 1 |
| Poland | 4 |
| Portugal | 1 |
| Singapore | 1 |
| South Africa | 2 |
| Spain | 1 |
| United Kingdom | 4 |
| United States of America | 6 |
Note: Extradition requests vary considerably in complexity and the time it takes to resolve them. The complexity of an extradition request depends on the criminal offences and the criminal conduct underlying the offences. The time taken to resolve an extradition request can vary from a few years, if a fugitive wishes to contest extradition and exercise all appeals, to a few months if a fugitive consents to extradition.
| Requests carried forward from 2003–04 | 170 |
| New requests made | 151 |
| Requests finalised* | 126 |
| Requests continuing TD> | 195 |
* Past annual reports have distinguished between 'requests executed' and 'requests otherwise completed'. From this year, these two categories have been combined under the single heading of 'requests finalised'. This category includes all requests for which assistance is no longer sought, including requests completely executed, requests partially executed where the remainder of the assistance is no longer required, and requests withdrawn.
| Argentina | 2 |
| Austria | 3 |
| Belgium | 6 |
| British Virgin Islands | 1 |
| Brunei | 1 |
| Canada | 3 |
| China | 2 |
| Dominica | 1 |
| Fiji | 3 |
| Finland | 1 |
| France | 1 |
| Germany | 10 |
| Greece | 2 |
| Hong Kong – Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China | 7 |
| Indonesia | 1 |
| Iran | 1 |
| Ireland | 1 |
| Italy | 2 |
| Japan | 2 |
| Lebanon | 1 |
| Monaco | 1 |
| Netherlands | 14 |
| Netherlands Antilles | 1 |
| New Zealand | 6 |
| Peru | 1 |
| Singapore | 5 |
| South Africa | 2 |
| Spain | 1 |
| Switzerland | 4 |
| Thailand | 4 |
| Turkey | 1 |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 |
| United Kingdom | 27 |
| United States of America | 7 |
| Obtain bank/business records | 28 |
| Search and seizure | 18 |
| Proceeds of crime (restraining and confiscation orders) | 3 |
| Service of documents | 3 |
| Other (obtain statement/conduct interview; obtain criminal records; obtain company records; obtain telecommunications records; obtain email records, etc) | 74 |
** Only the primary type of assistance provided is listed.
| Requests carried forward from 2003–04 | 162 |
| New requests | 205 |
| Requests finalised* | 191 |
| Requests refused | 0 |
| Requests continuing | 176 |
* Past annual reports have distinguished between 'requests executed' and 'requests otherwise completed'. From this year, these two categories have been combined under the single heading of 'requests finalised'. This category includes all requests for which assistance is no longer sought, including requests completely executed, requests partially executed where the remainder of the assistance is no longer required, and requests withdrawn.
| Argentina | 2 |
| Austria | 6 |
| Belarus | 1 |
| Belgium | 5 |
| Burma/Myanmar | 1 |
| Chile | 1 |
| Croatia | 3 |
| Czech Republic | 1 |
| Denmark | 3 |
| Estonia | 1 |
| Fiji | 1 |
| France | 1 |
| Germany | 9 |
| Hong Kong – Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China | 2 |
| Hungary | 47 |
| Italy | 7 |
| Latvia | 1 |
| Liechtenstein | 2 |
| Mexico | 1 |
| Monaco | 1 |
| Netherlands | 18 |
| New Zealand | 6 |
| Norway | 1 |
| Poland | 3 |
| Portugal | 1 |
| Russian Federation | 4 |
| Scotland | 2 |
| Serbia and Montenegro | 1 |
| Slovak Republic | 1 |
| Slovenia | 2 |
| Spain | 4 |
| Sri Lanka | 1 |
| Sweden | 1 |
| Switzerland | 10 |
| Turkey | 8 |
| Ukraine | 2 |
| United Kingdom | 18 |
| United States of America | 10 |
| Vanuatu | 1 |
| Zambia | 1 |
| Obtain bank/business records | 14 |
| Take evidence | 35 |
| Search and seizure | 19 |
| Service of documents | 98 |
| Other (obtain statement/conduct interview; obtain telecommunications records; obtain brief of evidence; obtain certificates of conviction, etc) | 25 |
** Only the primary type of assistance provided is listed.
Two requests (one from the United States of America and one from New Zealand) were received and executed under the Mutual Assistance in Business Regulation Act 1992 in the past financial year.
There were four new requests for assistance from the International War Crimes Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in The Hague during 2004–05 (and four carried over from 2003–04). Included in the four new requests were requests to locate a witness, serve documents on a witness and make arrangements for witnesses to travel to The Hague to give evidence.
There were no cases on hand concerning the International War Crimes Tribunal for Rwanda or the Special Court for Sierra Leone or the International Criminal Court.
| Commonwealth entrya | 51 |
| Commonwealth staya | 78 |
| Commonwealth trafficking stayb | 23 |
| State entry (endorsed)c | 18 |
| Commonwealth entry | 42 |
| Commonwealth stay | 67 |
| Commonwealth trafficking stay | 5 |
| State entry | 11 |
| Commonwealth entry | 22 |
| Commonwealth stay | 192 |
| Commonwealth trafficking stay | 23 |
| Belgium | 1 |
| Bolivia | 1 |
| Brazil | 2 |
| Canada | 6 |
| Colombia | 6 |
| France | 1 |
| Germany | 1 |
| Hong Kong – Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China | 9 |
| India | 10 |
| Indonesia | 14 |
| Iran | 1 |
| Iraq | 8 |
| Israel | 2 |
| Japan | 2 |
| Korea | 1 |
| Malaysia | 17 |
| Mexico | 1 |
| Netherlands | 9 |
| New Zealand | 2 |
| Nigeria | 3 |
| North Korea | 1 |
| Pakistan | 3 |
| People's Republic of China | 28 |
| Peru | 1 |
| Republic of China (Taiwan) | 1 |
| Singapore | 14 |
| South Africa | 9 |
| South Korea | 1 |
| Spain | 7 |
| St Vincent and the Grenadines | 1 |
| Thailand | 36 |
| Tonga | 1 |
| United Kingdom | 16 |
| United States of America | 15 |
| Uruguay | 1 |
| Uzbekistan | 1 |
| Vietnam | 3 |
| Unknown | 1 |
| Year | Cases carried forward | New requests made | Requests granted | Requests refused | Requests otherwise completed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000–01 | 16 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 0 |
| 2001–02* | 13 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 5 |
| 2002–03 | 10 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003–04 | 15 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 3 |
| 2004–05 | 14 | 9 | 7 | 0 | 2 |
* During 2001–02, the Extradition Unit developed and implemented an electronic records and statistical retrieval system to replace the paper-based system used in previous reporting periods. This more accurate and comprehensive system, and the process of transcribing paper-based records and archival information to it, identified some discrepancies between opening and closing balances.
| Year | Cases carried forward | New requests made | Requests granted | Requests refused | Requests otherwise completed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000–01 | 39 | 15 | 13 | 1 | 2 |
| 2001–02* | 32 | 16 | 8 | 3 | 1 |
| 2002–03 | 36 | 23 | 8 | 6 | 2 |
| 2003–04 | 43 | 23 | 14 | 3 | 5 |
| 2004–05 | 44 | 15 | 12 | 1 | 13 |
* During 2001–02, the Extradition Unit developed and implemented an electronic records and statistical retrieval system to replace the paper-based system used in previous reporting periods. This more accurate and comprehensive system, and the process of transcribing paper-based records and archival information to it, identified some discrepancies between opening and closing balances.
| Year | Cases carried forward | New requests made | Requests granted | Requests refused | Requests otherwise completed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000–01 | 32 | 63 | 31 | 0 | 10 |
| 2001–02 | 54 | 88 | 44 | 2 | 19 |
| 2002–03 | 77 | 135 | 62 | 0 | 22 |
| 2003–04 | 133* | 161 | 104 | 0 | 51 |
| 2004–05 | 170 | 151 | 126 | 0 | n/a |
* The higher figures for mutual assistance requests carried forward in 2003–04 for requests made to and from Australia reflect the practice adopted in 2003–04 of counting supplementary requests as separate requests.
| Year | Cases carried forward | New requests made | Requests granted | Requests refused | Requests otherwise completed |
| 2000–01 | 78* | 153 | 148 | 0 | 38 |
| 2001–02 | 45* | 156 | 78 | 0 | 13 |
| 2002–03 | 110 | 166 | 124 | 2 | 38 |
| 2003–04 | 117† | 179 | 109 | 1 | 30 |
| 2004–05 | 162 | 205 | 198 | 0 | n/a |
* During 2003–04, the Mutual Assistance Unit implemented an electronic records and statistical retrieval database to replace the paper-based system used in previous reporting periods. This new mutual assistance database has provided a more accurate and comprehensive records system, which has identified some discrepancies between the figures in 2003–04 and previous reporting periods.
† The higher figures for mutual assistance requests carried forward in 2003–04 for requests made to and from Australia reflect the practice adopted in 2003–04 of counting supplementary requests as separate requests.
The International Criminal Court Act 2002 (the ICC Act) entered into force on 28 June 2002.
The ICC Act includes an annual reporting requirement under section 189, which adopts recommendation 6 of the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties' Report 45 on the ratification of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (the ICC Statute). Section 189 provides that the Department must publish each year, as an appendix to the Department's annual report for that year, a report on the operation of this Act, the operations of the International Criminal Court (the ICC), and the impact of the operations of the ICC on Australia's legal system.
The purpose of these reports is to enable Parliament to ensure that, in light of the operation and jurisprudential developments of the ICC, it continues to be in Australia's national interest to remain a Party to the ICC Statute.
The ICC Act establishes mechanisms to permit Australia to comply with its international obligations under the ICC Statute. It also contains provisions to implement the terms of a declaration that Australia lodged with its ratification. The declaration indicates how Australia will practically give effect to the Statute while fully adhering to its obligations. The declaration protects Australian sovereignty by:
The Parliament enacted amendments to the Criminal Code Act 1995 in the International Criminal Court (Consequential Amendments) Act 2002 (the ICC (CA) Act) to ensure that all crimes set out in the ICC Statute are also crimes in Australian domestic law. The ICC has jurisdiction only if national courts are unwilling or unable to genuinely investigate or prosecute a case. The ICC (CA) Act ensures that Australia will always be able to investigate or prosecute ICC crimes if necessary, thereby guaranteeing that Australia will retain primary jurisdiction over all such crimes committed on Australian territory or by Australian citizens.
In conjunction with the Defence Force Discipline Act 1982, the ICC Act and the ICC (CA) Act have had a significant positive impact on Australia's overseas military operations during the reporting year. By defining with greater certainty individual criminal responsibility of Australian Defence Force members and others for crimes under the ICC Statute in Australian domestic law, the legislation has lent greater certainty to these operations. More broadly, the legislation will perform an important role in upholding the rule of law and punishing those guilty of the most serious crimes of international concern.
The ICC Statute was adopted and opened for signature and ratification on 17 July 1998 by the United Nations Diplomatic Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court. The Statute entered into force generally on 1 July 2002. As of 1 July 2005, there are 99 Parties and 139 signatories to the ICC Statute. Australia signed the Statute on 9 December 1998 and ratified the Statute on 1 July 2002. The Statute entered into force for Australia on 1 September 2002.
The entry into force of the ICC Statute established the first permanent international court capable of investigating and prosecuting the most serious crimes of international concern. The ICC fills a legal vacuum that could otherwise prevent the prosecution of egregious crimes due to a lack of judicial infrastructure or political will. The ICC is physically established in The Hague, the Netherlands.
The ICC jurisdiction is limited to the crimes of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes. The ICC jurisdiction is further limited to crimes committed after the ICC Statute's entry into force on 1 July 2002. All crimes over which the ICC has jurisdiction are strictly defined in the ICC Statute. The definitions reflect international law that predates the Court's existence.
No new crime can be added to the ICC's jurisdiction until seven years after the Statute's entry into force (1 July 2009). Importantly, no new crime will apply to acts done in the territory of, or by citizens of, a State Party that has not ratified that crime. The only new crime currently being contemplated is the crime of aggression.
A Working Group of States Parties has been discussing possible definitions and other aspects of this crime. An intersessional meeting of the Special Working Group on the Crime of Aggression was held at the Liechtenstein Institute on Self Determination at Princeton University from 13 to 15 June 2005.
Since the entry into force of the ICC Statute, Australia has actively participated in the Assembly of States Parties. Each State Party has one vote in the Assembly. The Assembly's responsibilities include electing officers of the ICC and providing management oversight of the administration of the Court.
Australia participated in the Third Assembly of States Parties from 6 to 10 September 2004.
Key achievements of the Third Assembly of States Parties included:
The Committee on Budget and Finance appointed David Dutton of Australia as Rapporteur for the fourth session of the Committee, held from 4 to 6 April 2005.
The Fourth Assembly of States Parties will take place from 28 November to 3 December 2005 in The Hague.
The ICC is investigating three situations, one in Uganda at the request of the Ugandan Government (the activities of the Lord's Resistance Army), one in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) at the request of the President of the DRC, and one in the Darfur region of Sudan at the request of the United Nations Security Council (referred on 31 March 2005). For further information about the ICC, see generally www.icc-cpi.int.
The ICC has also received a referral of the general situation in the Central African Republic (CAR) from the CAR Government, and the Prosecutor will carry out an analysis in order to determine whether to initiate an investigation.
As no cases have yet been tried by the ICC, its operation has had no discernible impact upon Australia's legal system. The future impact of ICC operations is expected to depend on how many active prosecutions and investigations the ICC undertakes and the number and nature of requests for assistance received by Australia.