​​​​​​​
You are here: Skip breadcrumbAttorney-General's Department >> Integrity >> Counter fraud >> Fraud countermeasures >> Quality assurance checks

 Quality assurance checks

Detection shield icon Previous page Next page

Summary

Individual activities are quality checked to confirm correctness.

Quality assurance checks not only improve processing standards, they can also detect fraudulent activity and are a significant deterrent to fraud.

Examples

Some examples of this type of countermeasure include:

  • A random selection of work (e.g. 2% of processed claims) is subject to a quality check.
  • Higher-risk activities are subject to quality checks on all occasions.
  • Purchased orders above $10,000 are quality checked by a procurement team prior going to the spending approver.

Purpose of this countermeasure

A staff member can abuse their position of trust to process fraudulent requests or claims for themselves or another person. A staff member can also be coerced to process a fraudulent request or claim for another person or entity, e.g. pressured to pay a fraudulent invoice.

Acting dishonestly or influencing a Commonwealth public official to commit fraud are offences under the Criminal Code Act 1995.

Trusting staff to follow procedures and make correct decisions without quality checks can lead to:

  • dysfunctional and obscure processes, and
  • poor management of performance, decision-making and risk.

This can also lead to more errors, which fraudsters can then exploit. Staff will also be less deterred from committing deliberate acts of fraud.

Dependencies

This type of control is supported by:

How do I know if my countermeasures are effective?

You can apply the following methods to measure the effectiveness of these types of countermeasures:

  • Compare processes with Quality Assurance policies and standards.
  • Confirm that critical processes are checked.
  • Analyse data related to quality checks. Measure results against KPIs.
  • Review the quality checking process to determine if checks would identify fraud (they might not check the right things).
  • Process walk through – sit with a checker to see what they check.
  • Conduct interviews, workshops or surveys with staff who complete checks to measure their understanding and thoughts about fraud control policies.
  • Confirm there is an independent review for high risk activities, e.g. by staff in other locations
  • Identify the percentage of claims quality checked. Does this differ for competent staff?

Back to top

Previous page Next page​​

​​​​Commonwealth Fraud Prevention Centre logo​​​​​​​