Skip to main content

Coronavirus (COVID-19) and the Attorney-General’s Department: Find out how our services are being delivered and how you can access them. For the latest COVID-19 news, updates and advice from the Australian Government, visit Australia.gov.au

Trained fraud analysts and investigators

 

N/A
Previous page

 

Next page

Summary

Staff are trained to analyse and investigate fraud.

Examples

  • Staff employed in compliance, investigations and fraud control hold the minimum required qualifications.

Purpose of this countermeasure

Failing to train and support staff to analyse and investigate different types and complexities of fraud can lead to less effective investigations.

Under the Criminal Code Act 1995, the prosecution bears a legal burden of proving every element of an offence relevant to the guilt of the person charged. Furthermore, the offence must be proven beyond reasonable doubt.

Dependencies

This type of countermeasure is supported by:

How do I know if my countermeasures are effective?

You can apply the following methods to measure the effectiveness of these types of countermeasures:

  • Analyse HR data on training /qualifications for fraud investigators (this information is also reported to the Australian Institute of Criminology (AIC) for their annual ‘Fraud against the Commonwealth’ census). Benchmark results against:
  • Review any supplementary training/qualifications provided to fraud analysts and investigators.
  • Consult analysts and investigators. Confirm that the training/qualifications are adequate for the type of fraud threats involved.
  • Survey analysts and investigators to gauge their level of confidence to investigate specific types of fraud.
  • Commonwealth agencies can review the APSC Census results for teams involved in analysing and investigation fraud. Do staff feel they receive adequate training and support?

 

Previous page
Next page

​​

​​​​

Commonwealth Fraud Prevention Centre logo