Ke Chun Rong v Australia (416/2010) Views of 5 November 2012
Human Rights Communications
416/2010 concerning removal to China
The author alleged that Australia would violate article 3 of the CAT if the author was returned to China, as he claimed to be a regular practitioner and leader of Falun Gong. The author's application for a protection visa was refused. The Committee issued adverse views. The Australian Government has noted the views of the Committee.