Q.H.L. v Australia (1938/2010) Views of 25 March 2013
Human Rights Communications
1938/2010 concerning removal to China
The author alleged that Australia would violate articles 6, 7, 9, 14 and 17 of the ICCPR if the author was returned to China. The author's application for a protection visa was refused. The Committee found the matter inadmissible.