Rights and Protections Publications
Showing 21 - 40 of 260 results
Search results
The author alleged that Australia had violated articles 2(3), 14(1), 26, and 27 of the ICCPR, read in light of article 1, through the Federal Court's dismissal of a native title claim made by the author. The Committee issued adverse views in respect of article 14(1), read alone and in conjunction with article 2(3)(a), and article 27, read in light of article 1.
The author alleged that by deporting him to Malta, Australia had violated articles 9(1); 12(4); 14(7), read in conjunction with articles 9, 12(4) and 17; and 17, read in conjunction with articles 2(2) and 23(1) of the ICCPR. The Committee issued adverse views in respect of articles 9(1) and 12(4):
The author alleged that Australia would violate article 3 of the CAT if it were to deport the author to Sri Lanka. The author’s application for a protection visa was refused. The Committee found that Australia would not be in violation if the author was removed.
The author alleged that Australia would violate article 3 of the CAT if it were to deport the author to Sri Lanka. The author’s application for a protection visa was refused. The Committee found the matter inadmissible.
A discussion paper on copyright and AI transparency issues circulated to the Copyright and AI Reference Group (CAIRG) for input.
A summary of CAIRG responses to a discussion paper on copyright and AI transparency issues.
Please follow the links below for more information about each of the publications and their relevance to the CAIRG work.
R.T. v Australia (958/2019) Views of 29 April 2024
N.J. v Australia (1021-2020) Views of 19 April 2024
The Australian Government’s response to the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee report on COVID-19 Royal Commission was tabled in Parliament on 5 September 2024.
3088/2017 concerning the right to fair trial and the right to privacy in anti-corruption inquiries.
3088/2017 concerning the right to fair trial and the right to privacy in anti-corruption inquiries.
This page contains a document relating to the Copyright and AI Reference Group (CAIRG) governance framework.
1012/2020 concerning removal to Iran
The author alleged that Australia would violate article 3 of the CAT if the author was returned to Iran. The author’s application for a protection visa was refused. The Committee found the matter inadmissible.
995/2020 concerning removal to Pakistan
The author alleged that Australia would violate article 3 of the CAT if the author was returned to Pakistan. The author’s application for a protection visa was refused. The Committee found that Australia would not be in violation if the author was removed.
Terms of Reference for the Respect@Work Council’s 2024-26 term.